S888Wheel wrote:
From: Ron
Date: 12/30/2004 6:43 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:
On 30 Dec 2004 14:47:55 -0800, wrote:
So why don't you manufacture some stupendously expensive **** and
make
money? Seems like something to celebrate, to me.
Actually, the field is quite crowded. Breaking in won't be easy.
You may be integrested in a recent Stereophile review of a $350,000
powert amp. Performance and specs were mediocre to poor. Had it
cost, say, $1000, it would have been pooh poohed by the venerable
reviewer.
Did he tell you this or did you read his mind?
To most of us it's obvious that the OP was speculating. Sorry that this
shading of meaning flew over your head, Scott.
Since it cost a seriously obscene (not to say, ridiculous)
amount of money, the reviewer went out of his way to justify the
price...
Or maybe he liked the sound.
Sighted evaluation, right? ;-)
I read Stereophile for amusement and this was one of their best
efforts, right next to their review of the Hacro $25,000 (or was it
$24,000?) amp whose silence (so they claimed) was better than the
silence of other, less expensive amps..
All this talk about prices of amps and yet you waste your money on a
magazine
you don't like.
Somehow most of us perceive a tiny difference between Stereophile's
$12.97 subscription price and the $25,000 price of a pair of Halcro
monoblocks.
Apparently $24,987.03 means nothing to an award-winning Hollywood
makeup artist. Well then good for you, Scott! It explains why you were
so willing to waste your money on sueing me for libel, I guess.