"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...

"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...

"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
link.net...

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...

"George M. Middius" wrote in message
...


Mickey, I noticed you've started complaining about people being mean
to
you. The first time, I laughed at the absurdity of the accusation.
Then
I realized you were ****ing serious! What a joke that is. Apparently
you
actually expect people to indulge your nastiness and irrationality.
Not
to mention your seemigly infinite stupidity.

I would like to state at this juncture that yes, I do pity you. It's
been obvious for a long time that your mental gears grind slowly and
out
of sync. Many of us also pity Krooger, but like you, Mr. **** is so
over-the-top obnoxious that irritation and revulsion overcome our
gentler emotions.

Anyway, here's my question: Why do you expect people to pat you on
the
head when you say such immensely stupid and nasty things? NB: If you
have any question about which of your statements fall into those
categories, you can figure it out by examining the replies to your
posts. Not just the ones from me, or Boon, or BJ, or any of the
people
on your enemies list. Over the years, many people have commented on
how
stupid and obnoxious you are.

As an addendum, you could reduce the number of insults you receive by
being less stupid. Food for thought.


It's no use, his stupidity is eclipsed by only his total lack of self
awareness.
That is his underlying problem, that is why he is utterly amazed that
those that he offends ove a long period of time would have the
audacity
to finally begin dumping back on him.

Nice revisionist history.

Except for very rare occaisons when I thought someone'e behavior was
just flat out over the top, I have not attacked people in any audio
discussion.

Off topic stuff, particularly about politics was generally incited by
somebody like Sanders in which I tried to present another viewpoint.

I pitied him for quite a while, its been years now. The string has run
out now.

Whatever excuse you can find for being vicious and boorish. Note that
I never said anything bad about you even when we disagreed. You on the
other hand when I wouldn't just concede your viwepoint was correct
would then holler "stupid." If you think I'm going to now think I'm the
big bad guy here, you better think again.



Anybody who thinks we can build a highway sysytem without use of
eminent domain is eminently stupid, and that's de facto!

In your opinion.


There hasn't been any high way systems built based upon your opinion of
the matter.
There have been hundreds built based upon my opinion of the matter.

The principle is still the same for me. Government should not be able to
separate people from their property by force.

Do I expect to see my ideal of the way things ought to be in my lifetime?
No. That doesn't mean the principle is incorrect.