Philip Franklin said:

(Joe Duffy) wrote in message
...
In article ,
John Atkinson wrote:

Again:

1) Marc Phillips' original statement: "Then I would have problems with
child pornography."

2) As rewritten by Arny Krueger: "I have problems getting as much child
pornography as I need."

Unless the Krueger posting is a forgery, to those like Mike McKelvy, who
feel that Arny Krueger is not to blame for the high level of flames on
r.a.o., how is this childish behavior on AK's part excusable?


This is quite the sentence.
Where is that syntax midjet when he
is needed?
Time to parse:
"...those...who feel that Arny Krueger is not to blame
for the high level of flames on r.a.o,"
The illogical corollary you insinuate, is that
Arny Krueger IS (solely, implied) to blame for the
high level of flames on r.a.o.
Of course Arny is jointly to blame, with the
rest of the festering rodents, for the high level
of flames on r.a.o.
Of course, this childish behavior of AK is not
excusable.
Are you trying to clear something up here?
It is remarkable to watch someone get into a
****ing contest with a skunk, and in a cesspool
to boot. It begs the question...


Just curious.


As well.



Joe





Unbelievable.

You're defending Krueger, and you're also putting words in somone else's
mouth.

What a headcase you must be.

And he is. Joe Duffy is a classic Usenet troll who posts on this NG only to
attack others. And yes, he supports Arny, a proven pedophile.

The disappointing thing about Joe is that once or twice he's revealed that he
has good taste in music, and he's pretty knowledgeable about it, too. Too bad
he chooses not to contribute to the group.

Boon