"The [August 6, 2001, memo] was no indication of a terrorist attack
"ryanm" wrote in message
...
"Cossie" wrote in message
...
And believe me, my mentioning of that problem wasn't intended to
exclude all of the other screw-ups, lies, and misdirections. What
makes you think ignoring terrorists entering the country and ignoring
warnings from the FBI are mutually exclusive?
Ah, but wasn't that particular screw-up presided over by Clinton?
Didn't
most of them enter the country while he was president? I'm just trying to
get a handle on your position. Everyone likes to make these soundbyte-like
statements, but as soon as I raise a question the story usually changes.
I can appreciate your attempt to get the facts right, and your unwillingness
to take at face value everything you hear or read. But if you read this
entire thread, you will see that I have already rebutted the argument that
most of the hijackers came into the US on Clinton's watch. It was a long,
research intensive post with a timeline of the hijackers' movements taken
from conservative sources on the 'net, and I won't post it again. Go back
and read it.
Bill Balmer
|