AudioBanter.com - View Single Post

In article ,
(ScotFraser) wrote:

Now I'm forced to admit that absolute clarity and purity of sound is not
the only solution in all situations. Sometimes the perfectly accurate
sound is too sterile.

Well, yeah. Sometimes to achieve the appearance of transparency you have to
do
things that purists won't ever consider, on strictly philosophical grounds,
like EQ & compression. And microphones with personality can add spice. Pea
soup
made just from peas may be an accurate representation of the taste of peas,
but
pea soup with spices added is an interesting eating experience.

I'm still not buying into the idea of introducing
any distortion into the recording chain, but I can see how the shimmer of
an "interesting" microphone can add to an already good recording. BRBR

I think one has to simply get over ones opposition to close miking if that's
the flavor that gives us listening pleasure.

Scott Fraser

As much as I have tried not to, I find I still like the hyper-realistic
representation I can create better than the actual sounds that come into the
microphones. I guess that's where the fun lies for me. It is kind of like
cooking.

The best thing about teaching others about recording is seeing their faces when
they realize what can be done with dynamics processing and equalization.

-Jay
--
x------- Jay Kadis ------- x---- Jay's Attic Studio ------x
x Lecturer, Audio Engineer x Dexter Records x
x CCRMA, Stanford University x http://www.offbeats.com/ x
x---------- http://ccrma.stanford.edu/~jay/ ------------x