"Moi" wrote in message


On Thu, 7 Aug 2003 16:12:34 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote in :

"MiNE 109" wrote in message

In article ,
MiNE 109 wrote:

None of this has anything requires eq.

None of this has anything THAT requires eq. Hmm, still not very
good.

None of this requires eq.

You've missed the point again. An audio signal is an audio signal
whether being carried by air, water, land, wire, optical, you name
it.

An equalizer is something that changes frequency balance,
whether it's a mic, a phono cartridge, a speaker, or (heaven
forbid!) a purpose-built easily adjustable dedicated electronic
device.

This is a ridiculously loose and unworkable definition of the term
"equalizer" in the context of audio engineering.

So Moi, since when did you become such an authority about audio engineering?

Got any (believable) credentials?

According to what
you say above, if I cup my hands over my ears I'm using an equalizer,
and if I flip my middle finger up at you while I'm doing so then I've
just introduced a high-pass filter.

Pretty much, yes.

Thanks for pointing out that flipping up the middle finger in that posture
produces what appears at first listening to be a high-pass filter. I didn't
know that! I'll have to investigate it because it's a great example of a
crude acoustical filter (equalizer).

Arny, one day maybe you'll get over playing audio engineer on the
Internet.

So Moi, since when did you become an authority about audio engineering?

No matter what Moi, you just proved yourself to be a blithering idiot.
Again! You seem to know at least a few of what seem to be correct facts,
and then you reach the wrong conclusion!

What a maroon!

BTW Moi, since you don't believe a word I say, why not review this with John
Atkinson?

There are many other things you could have devoted your
time to (programming simple Visual Basic front ends, reading the
bible, etc), why not go with what you're good at?

I'm not very good at making figurative horses drink after leading them to
the water...