Krueger decides, as his obnoxious custom, to generate one of his usual idiotic
personal attacks:


"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message


A very good question. Especially so, given the fact that neither
poster reporting a preference for vinyl thus far, has said anything
about how their system is "balanced" (a term not defined btw by the
poster making this unsupported claim).

Obviously Richman, you can't read. I guess that Ideologically-Induced
Reading Comprehension Syndrome (IIRCS) have returned to RAO despite the
apparent exit of Singh.


Your stupidity has once again been demonstrtated, Krueger. One can always
count on you to demonstrate your inability to make ssnse. Perhaps you and your
buddy, Timmy Brown, can find true happiness together as you go about your
merry, hatemongering ways.

Now, since you decided to exhibit your usual deceptive deletion and selective
editing of what you wrote and I wrote in response, I guess I'll just have to
rub your snout in the dirt in which you live again:

Here's the original post from the compulsive liar, Krueger:

Message-id:

"Max Holubitsky" wrote in message

1) When listening to music, what format do you listen to more often,
every time, etc.?

LP - 45%
CD - 45%
Open reel, internet radio, FM, Digital cable radio, cassette, etc -
10%

2) What are the TWO primary differences you hear between the two (If
you do not hear any or the differences are very subtle, please say
so)?

CD - better dynamic range, less background noise, flatter frequency
response
LP - can listen to longer without "listening fatigue", which makes up
for most of its technical shortcomings on a day to day basis, for me.

Typical of a system that has been balanced to favor LPs.

end of post by Krueger

As can be seen, Krueger did NOT say anything here about his preference for
CD's. He, quite predictably like the anti-vinyl bigot he has proven to be many
times on RAO, just made a stupid, illogical and undocumented smear against
vinyl, and by extension, Mr. Holubitsky's response to the original poster's
question re. preference. One can always count on Krueger to attack personally
those who favor vinyl. The Google record will also demonstrate that he has
long history of making personal attacks against those who prefer vinyl.

To continue with the illustration of the compulsive liar, Krueger's, juvenile
attempt to misrepresent what I wrote so that he could personally attack it,
below is the response to Krueger's response above:

Dr. Richman said:


Hans wrote:


"Arny Krueger" skrev i en meddelelse
...

Typical of a system that has been balanced to favor LPs.


"I am very interested to hear about people's experiences with both
formats. Please keep the threads limited to individual responses (no
debates as this isn't and should have nothing to do with an analysis
of the two formats). This is purely subjective and extremely
appreciated by me for those that complete the following two questions:"


Please tell me what it is that you don't understand in the above text?

/ Hans















A very good question. Especially so, given the fact that neither poster
reporting a preference for vinyl thus far, has said anything about how their
system is "balanced" (a term not defined btw by the poster making this
unsupported claim).



end of my post

So once again, the compulsive liar and deceptive editor of posts, Krueger, has
been caught. The following points are obvious:

(1) Krueger's name was never mentioned by me in the post in which he smeared
both Mr. Holubitsky and his preference for vinyl playback.

(2) Krueger repeated the same unsolicited personal attack and anti-vinyl smear
against Scott (who posts as s888wheel).

(3) In no case was there ANY evidence that either of their systems is
"balanced" towards vinyl playback prersented.

(4) The compulsive liar, Krueger presented no evidence to support his personal
attacks against both of the above posters.

(5) The deceptive editor, Krueger, once again deliberately deleted what I wrote
and tried to misrepresent what I said so he could provide another personal
attack.
In so doing, he succeeded in doing nothing but to demonstrate his well-known
stupidity, lack of honesty, and compulsive need to attack one of his many
"enemies" (a list that grows ever-longer as more and more people disagree with
this odious, paranoid hatemonger).

(6) Krueger demonstrates both how arrogant and stupid he is to believe that he
can get away with such transparent and fraudulent misrepresentations of what
people have said.


So there we have just the latest illustration of why this paranoid, compulsive
liar has become the well-documented, most despised and hated poster on RAO. A
well-earned reputation, in light of the fact that he has personally attacked
without provocation more different individual posters than any other poster on
RAO, now or in the past.



Bruce J. Richman