Thread: To R.A.O group
View Single Post
  #21   Report Post  
dave weil
 
Posts: n/a
Default To R.A.O group

On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 15:24:28 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:


"dave weil" wrote in message
.. .
On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 14:40:52 -0400, in rec.audio.opinion you wrote:

"dave weil" wrote in message

On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 13:48:15 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

"dave weil" wrote in message
...


Furthermore Weil as you admit, I posted a proper link to the post
so people could easily read the whole thing at their leisure. That
means that I effectively provided the entire context, even
adjacent posts which google will quickly provide once you have my
link.

In contrast Weil, neither you nor Lionel posted a proper link,

I certainly *did* provide the proper link.

Not in your 11:12 EDT post.

That post wasn't addressed in that post.

Horsefeathers:

"dave weil" wrote in message
at 11:12 EDT


"Arny Krüger wrote to Jennifer:

"It's really amazing how you can be so dominated by hate. You have
some physical condition that puts you in pain a lot of the time?"

Jennifer replies:

"Arnold, you are one basty nastard. Not for referring to my
"handicap", but for lying about having no knowledge of it...and
insinuating I had attempted to take some kind of devious advantage
of you.

Note absence of URLs


Note that this deceptive edited quoting is actually quoting me quoting
someone else and has nothing to do with the post in question anyway.

Weil has been caught yet again!


Looks like you caught yourself this time, Arnold.

When will his madness end?


Where is the reference to the McKelvy post that we were talking about?


In the post I posted the URL for, Weil.

Anybody who wants to can read it he

http://www.google.com/groups?selm=Pi....14198-100000%
40jed.deltaforce.net

It's got a clear reference to the McKelvy post that we were talking about,
which I won't quote because its already been quoted to death in this thread.


Yes, but that post wasn't referenced in the 11:12 EDT post that you
talk about. The first time I actually mentioned that post, the link
*was* posted.

You've obviously gone way off the deep end, Weil.

Weil, I'll leave you to drown in your lies unless you can come up with
something more interesting than such obvious lies.


I think you *are* insane. You accuse me of not posting the link in a
certain post in which I didn't even mention said post.

You need to either admit that you were wrong or just give it up
entirely.

You can't even admit your mistake.