On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 14:40:52 -0400, in rec.audio.opinion you wrote:

"dave weil" wrote in message

On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 13:48:15 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

"dave weil" wrote in message
...


Furthermore Weil as you admit, I posted a proper link to the post
so people could easily read the whole thing at their leisure. That
means that I effectively provided the entire context, even
adjacent posts which google will quickly provide once you have my
link.

In contrast Weil, neither you nor Lionel posted a proper link,

I certainly *did* provide the proper link.

Not in your 11:12 EDT post.

That post wasn't addressed in that post.

Horsefeathers:

"dave weil" wrote in message
at 11:12 EDT


"Arny Krüger wrote to Jennifer:

"It's really amazing how you can be so dominated by hate. You have
some physical condition that puts you in pain a lot of the time?"

Jennifer replies:

"Arnold, you are one basty nastard. Not for referring to my
"handicap", but for lying about having no knowledge of it...and
insinuating I had attempted to take some kind of devious advantage
of you.

Note absence of URLs

Note that this deceptive edited quoting is actually quoting me quoting
someone else and has nothing to do with the post in question anyway.

Weil has been caught yet again!

Looks like you caught yourself this time, Arnold.

When will his madness end?

Where is the reference to the McKelvy post that we were talking about?

Guess what? It doesn't exist in that post.

However, here is the first of FIVE proper links that I posted in that
post:

So, are you lying NOW, or were you lying when you wrote this:

http://groups.google.com/groups?selm.... prodigy.com

"It's called receiving them as unsolicited email attachments,
forgetting that they existed, and simply not deleting them because
they were forgotten. Lots of bad things happened in the same general
period of time. For example, back in 1999 my wife was first showing
strong symptoms of Rheumatoid Arthritis, and it looked like she might
end up bedridden and in considerable pain for the rest of her life".

So, let's look carefully at this statement. You claim that it was
looking like she might end up bedridden and in considerable painfor
the rest of her life and this FIRST occured less than 4 years ago. And
then you claim that she's been in almost complete remission FOR YEARS,
implying that it wasn't any big deal around the time that Jennifer was
on this group.
-----------------------------------

Therefore, your statement, "In contrast Weil, neither you nor Lionel
posted a proper link", is FIVE times a lie.

Do you wish to acknowledge your error now? Or do you want to continue
making a fool of yourself som more?