On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 12:06:16 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:
"dave weil" wrote in message
On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 10:02:39 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:
"Lionel Chapuis" wrote in message
Yesterday I have answered a little bit hardly to Dave Weil after he
opens an other thread about Arny Krueger. In my answer in French I
suggested him to create a new NG with Mr Krueger for central topic
in order to stop pollution of R.A.O.
It seemed me that from a purely technical point of view Mr Krueger
has a knowledge and experience. When he limits his answers to
technical statements some of his opinion are interesting, some of
his ideas find naturally place on this forum.
But after a deeper search in the group history I must acknowledge
that Mr Krueger is an insane sadist and I don't want to deal with
any of his technical tips even if they are exact and helpful.
Gosh, it didn't take Middius and his group of creeps long to get to
you, did it?
Here it comes...
For those who can be surprised by my today position I let you find
just one excerpt of what I have found :
Here's the more complete listing of the context with proper references:
Jennifer wrote on RAO about Arny to Mike McKelvy. This means that the
statement at that point was completely gratuitous on her part:
http://www.google.com/groups?selm=Pi....14198-100000%
40jed.deltaforce.net
"It's time to embrace that love for objectivity and read Arnold's
posts with an open mind. Arny's blatancies are not only intentional,
they are often premeditated and designed to slur."
"I don't often agree with you regarding audio or politics, but I
consider you to be an honest and very direct man. How you can ignore
or even condone Arny's lying, twisted behavior on RAO is beyond my
comprehension, Mike."
Now who's doing selective and deceptive posting. Here, let's post THE
ENTIRE post that you gave a link for:
http://www.google.com/groups?selmOn 23 Feb 2000, Mikeylikst wrote:
Date: 23 Feb 2000 05:47:04 GMT
From: Mikeylikst
Newsgroups: rec.audio.opinion
Subject: Dither Again
From:
Because, Stephen, Glenn committed the ultimate sin in ArnyWorld: he
disagreed with him in public.
--
John Atkinson
Editor, Stereophile
The only real sin I saw was Glenn complaining what a **** Arni is, while
proving he can be a cruder and more obscene opponent in a debate.
Mike McKelvy
"The aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence
clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of
hobgoblins,all imagnary."
http://members.aol.com/rlspeakers/TH...SOUNDPAGE.html
Mike, I have championed you several times here on RAO, protested the
ugly stuff thrown your way, but even I have to call you on this one!!!
It's time to embrace that love for objectivity and read Arnold's posts
with an open mind. ARny's blatancies are not only intentional, they
are often premeditated and designed to slur.
I don't often agree with you regarding audio or politics, but I
consider you to be an honest and very direct man. How you can ignore
or even condone Arny's lying, twisted behavior on RAO is beyond my
comprehenstion, Mike.
Jennifer
=Pine.BSF.4.10.10002230655430.14198-100000%40jed.deltaforce.net
"It's time to embrace that love for objectivity and read Arnold's posts
with an open mind. Arny's blatancies are not only intentional, they are
often premeditated and designed to slur."
"I don't often agree with you regarding audio or politics, but I consider
you to be an honest and very direct man. How you can ignore or even
condone Arny's lying, twisted behavior on RAO is beyond my comprehension,
Mike."
Jennifer
Here's a direct question. why did you delete this line?:
"The only real sin I saw was Glenn complaining what a **** Arni is,
while proving he can be a cruder and more obscene opponent in a
debate".
That was Mike's line, the line that Jennifer was responding to. Did
you delete it because it would have put lie to the statement that her
mention of you was GRATUITOUS?
It obviously *wasn't* gratuitous, so you need to answer the question,
or retract and apologize.