"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Marc Phillips" wrote in message


Arny said:

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message


And above, we have yet the latest example of Krueger's delusional
fantasies about sockpuppets. He, of course, repeats this lie
frequently without any proof to support his lies.

OK Bruce, where is your proof for this claim that you made:



http://www.google.com/groups?selm=19...3%40ng-ck1.aol
.com

"It is worth noting that Kruger has now adopted this despicable
tactic (i.e. questioning the validity of another's identity and
credentials) - solely as a diversionary tactic to try and disguise the
attack that he elected
to start a series of personal attacks against me gratuitously. Of
course, his sockpuppet henchman, Haugen, paved the way for him."

Bruce Richman, I challenge you to post your indisputable proof that
Haugen was actually my sockpuppet.

He's not saying that Doug Haugen was YOUR sockpuppet.

What's unclear about "...his sockpuppet..."?

As one may note above the actual context is: "... his sockpuppet henchmen,"
In this context sockpuppet define the type of henchmen. Henchmen means: A
loyal and trusted follower or subordinate. Thus, the statement should mean
that the sockpuppet "Haugen" acted as your henchmen or a loyal and trusted
follower or subordinate. Note, by definition of henchmen, Arny can not be
the sockpuppet "Haugen," therefore by definition Richman did not may the
accusation that Mr. Krueger was the sockpuppet, only that the sockpuppet
acted as his loyal follower.
Hopefully this clear up things.

Phil