Arny said:

"Marc Phillips" wrote in message


Arny said:

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message


And above, we have yet the latest example of Krueger's delusional
fantasies about sockpuppets. He, of course, repeats this lie
frequently without any proof to support his lies.

OK Bruce, where is your proof for this claim that you made:


http://www.google.com/groups?selm=19...3%40ng-ck1.aol
.com

"It is worth noting that Kruger has now adopted this despicable
tactic (i.e. questioning the validity of another's identity and
credentials) - solely as a diversionary tactic to try and disguise the
attack that he elected
to start a series of personal attacks against me gratuitously. Of
course, his sockpuppet henchman, Haugen, paved the way for him."

Bruce Richman, I challenge you to post your indisputable proof that
Haugen was actually my sockpuppet.

He's not saying that Doug Haugen was YOUR sockpuppet.

What's unclear about "...his sockpuppet..."?

He's saying that Doug was your henchman AND a sockpuppet.

That's not what he said. I reproduced it above, in context.

What's unclear about "...his sockpuppet..."?

Doug was A sockpuppet, not YOUR sockpuppet.


If this were an isolated event..

What about this post:

http://www.google.com/groups?selm=20...8%40mb-m25.aol
.com

"The above paragraph should be enteitled "How To Put A Negative Spin on
Damaging
and Relevant Information" - by Arny "the sockpuppet and pathological liar"
Krueger. "

Here Richman claims that I'm a sockpuppet. This should amuse you Philips,
given that you've bragged about stalking me in my house.

No, I haven't.

So Phillips you
stalk sockpuppets in their imaginary houses? LOL!

Did the voices in your head tell you that would make sense?


That, it and of itself, is easy to prove.

What about this posts that claims that "tor b" is one of my sockpuppets:

http://www.google.com/groups?selm=20...9%40mb-m27.aol
.com

please notice the post's title


Then there is always:

http://www.google.com/groups?selm=20...6%40mb-m13.aol
.com

"Sockpuppet and liar Krueger, your inability to tell the truth is once again
in
evidence."

...and there are many more examples in google of Richman's delusional claims
about me and sockpuppets.

Great. Too bad Dr. Richman and I are two different people. You almost made
sense there for a minute.


Learn to read, pervert.

Yes, you should learn to read Phillips, and yes you are a pervert as you've
demonstrated here many times.


That would be an out and out lie, generated by someone who is so consumed by
his own perversions that he can no longer defend himself adequately. It is you
that is a pervert, and this is documented. I am not a pervert, and this has
never been documented.

Please make a note of this.

Boon