Thread: For Mr Krueger
View Single Post
  #10   Report Post  
dave weil
 
Posts: n/a
Default For Mr Krueger

On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 13:28:33 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

"dave weil" wrote in message

On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 11:43:51 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

"dave weil" wrote in message

On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 10:54:55 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

"dave weil" wrote in message


That didn't seem to bother you when he was on your side.

It didn't bother me more after he turned against me.

Now *this* is choice. He defended you for quite a while until *you*
turned on him.

Prove that I turned on him first. We all know that as a rule you're
delusional, Weil.


Back in May:


http://www.google.com/groups?q=g:thl...ie=UTF-8&oe=UT
F-8&selm=b9tjle%244i8%241%40geraldo.cc.utexas.edu

He wondered why everyone picked on you.


http://www.google.com/groups?q=g:thl...&ie=UTF-8&oe=U
TF-8&selm=b9uaav%24fkg%241%40geraldo.cc.utexas.edu

He was aghast that someone would mention your tragedy (ask yourself
why the turnaround, since he seemed so compassionate back then)


http://www.google.com/groups?q=krueg....opinion& hl=
en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&as_drrb=b&as_mind=12&as_minm=5&as_miny=2003&as_m axd
=24&as_maxm=7&as_maxy=2003&selm=ihi1fvgd6ivlc131c dhj54r7qfo00hf5v3%404ax.com
&rnum=4

Still on "your side" in June.

This seems to be the point where you decided to turn on him:


http://www.google.com/groups?q=g:thl...&ie=UTF-8&oe=U
TF-8&selm=9JGcndP_lOWOaIaiXTWJjQ%40comcast.com

"If you had a clue about how weapons work, and the exigencies of
finding something that someone wants to hide, you'd not be the least
bit surprised".

Note the snotty turn of phrase that you are so expert at.


All I can say is Weil, if that count's (sic) as turning on someone, then so be it.
I think you're delusional. I suppose you expect all your friends to pat you
on your head and tell you that you are right when you are wrong.


Ahhhh, I see. Can't disprove my proof. Thanks for abjectly throwing up
your hands in defeat.

Once the ice
is broken, the casual observer can follow the rest of the thread to
see how it goes downhill after that. Yes, it was *you* who threw the
first snot ball and destroyed another supporter.


According to the highly biased snot judgements of David Weil, well-known
victim of and hater of Arny Krueger.


No, according to Google. The interested party can follow the thread
and make up his or her own mind.

You just can't help yourself.


In your jaundiced view, Weil.


No, you've proved it over and over again. Thank you for allowing me to
point this out using a recent and easily accessable example!

Come back when you've got something that isn't contaminated by your
perverted opinions, Weil.


Or supported by Google, you mean...

BTW, for newbies, this is how is starts. You disagree with Mr.
Krueger, politely and with the intent of having a debate, and he
throws a snotty comment your way, which opens the door for an
escalation of flames. And then he denies any personal responsibility
for causing the problem.