On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 13:17:29 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

"dave weil" wrote in message

On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 12:03:24 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

"dave weil" wrote in message


You wouldn't last a week as a waiter. You don't have the common
sense that god gave a mule and that's essential in the job, as well
as actually being able to interact with people without having them
throw their entrees in your face.

Prove it.

Your posts here prove it. You have shown no people skills at all.

Why cast pearls before swine.

Weil, you lose additional points for failing to consider the fact that my
RAO persona is not the extent of my life. Particularly how I treat low life
such as yourself.


For all you know Weil, I've been a waiter at some time in my life
and unlike you, moved on to a more profitable and intellectually
challenging occupation.

IOW, you couldn't cut it as a waiter.

IOW Weil, you just don't know. You seem to actually believe what Middius
tells you. I'm sure he's laughing his ass off about that behind your back.

Working for a car company is NOT my idea of my blue heaven. sorry, you
lose.

Like I said Weil, you seem to actually believe what Middius tells you. I
haven't worked for a car company since 1975. I haven't worked for a car
company as Middius tells it since 1966.

Can you make up your mind please?

You *did* work for a car company, didn't you?

Oh I get it, you make $80,000 a year in tips.

No I don't. But I also don't have to support a wife and kids either.

Weil, are you bragging about the fact that no woman would ever have your
kids?

No, I'm bragging about the fact that I have the life that *I* choose,
not based on what someone *else* expects of me.

So, my income is quite good for the amount of flexibility I have with
my job, the interesting people that I get to interact with nightly,
the amount of good food and wine that I get to experience, and the job
satisfaction that I get from getting titles like Employee of the Year
in 2000.

Given the scope of the enterprise giving the award, am I supposed to laugh
or cry?

I dunno. A 2 million dollar restaurant that isn't even open for lunch
is a pretty good scope, I'd say.

You can cry now.

LOL!

That does raise the question as to what Marc Phillips problem is. I
think he's on a power trip, probably because like you he has almost
zero status in the real world. Only he lacks your masochism and
thus is very bitter against me.

If the record is reviewed by non-partisan people, they'll see that
it's *you* who must be the masochist, since you generate more hate
posts and hate threads directed at you than anyone in the history of
RAO, as well as drawing fire toward your family like a lighting rod
in a severe thunderstorm.

Fact of the matter is that the source of those hate threads were
people who had a few issues of their own, like Zippie. Interestingly
enough most of them don't post here any more. They were apparently
just caught up in the excitement of the moment. Or maybe their
sockpuppet masters decided to post under different names the next
month.

Still, you can only point to a handful of people who still support
you.

Weil, you've got me confused with someone who depends on unimportant stuff
like that.

More proof that you have no consideration for the group.

Even your supporters end up getting shat upon by you at some
point.

Thus Weil you prove that you've confused reasoned disagreement with being
shat upon.

Is that what you call the newest twist with Schizoid Man? Reasoned
disagreement? Why is it that you're able to turn reasonable people
into people not afraid to hand you your head?

Weil, answer why I'm involved in so many positive interactions in
all those other audio newsgroups, many of which would laugh you off
if you even tried to post. Most of these other NGs are simply over
your head.

Because you reserve your worst behavior for *this* group?

Because I treat people with the respect they deserve.

You mean like Schizoid Man, who wnet out on a limb for you on multiple
occasions? Or Mr. Oberlander, who did the same thing? Like joe duffy,
who used to be a staunch supporter but who now thinks that you are a
psycho? Is that how you repay the respect and support that those
people gave you?

Why do you hate this group so much that you would act like this here?

You're so blind Weil that you don't realize that I treat people here fine,
if they are fine or even unknown people.

Bull****. I just named three people who have found out that this is a
blatant lie.

Weil, answer why I'm still a leading on-topic responder to audio
questions around here, despite all of your off-topic attacks and
attempts to distract me.

Even when you answer on-topic, often you throw nastiness into the mix.

Well that would depend on the context, wouldn't it? On those rare occasions
where you are actually on-topic Weil and I answer you, do you seriously
think that I would forget how badly you've treated me all these years? Oh, I
get it, in Weil world, Weil is not accountable for his miserable behavior.

And the converse is true. You've treated me abysmally since i started
posted here. Even when I go for a while without mentioning you, you
have to toss my name around, not only here, but in other newsgroups as
well.

What is the "context" when someone asks about turntables and you heap
abuse on those who like the format?

Only a masochist would continue to subject himself to abuse of his
personal tragedy; in fact, when it doesn't occur in a while, to
gratuitiously (sic) bring it up to score pity points.

Well there we have another example of what a fine moral person David
Weil is. He's trying to score points by bringing up some personal
tragedy that somehow he thinks I'm associated with. Why don't you
tell us more details about that personal tragedy of mine, Weil?

See what I mean? I try to be sensitive, but you just want the details
to be sprayed all over RAO.

Weil, only a low-life like you would believe that there is a "sensitive" way
to use someone's personal tragedy against them. Thanks again for proving
what a low-life ******* you really are.

And it's even worse to ask a person to go into details of such things.
Nasty, Mr. Krueger.

Sorry, I'm not going to cooperate.

You already did, and you proved yourself to not only be a low life, but a
dissembling low life. We can call that a low-life squared, can we not?

No we can't.

You lose.

Again.

You can
play coy and imply that there's no such tragedy - that's just a
ludicrous proposition and one that is typical of your mastery of "the
debating trade".

IOW I trapped you again in your own words and it really hurts, eh Weil?

Oh really. Looks like it's *you* that I've shown to want to use your
tragedy to score points. OK, you asked for it. I was referring to the
passing of your son Nate.

I hope you're happy now.

You disgust me.

I nail you early and often Weil and you can dish it out but you can't take
it.

You really *must* be joking.

I note that you can't even offer any rebuttal to my dissembling of
your claims about who slimed who first and what knowledge I had about
the way that you'd end up treating Schizoid Man.

Afraid?

Of course you are.

But I'm glad you're here, with all of the snarling and
unsocial behavior that you reserve for RAO. It's fun to kick your ass.

I'll let you know when you actually land the first kick, Weil. But thanks
again for showing the newbies what a scum you really are. I couldn't have
done it better if I tried. And believe you me, this wasn't me trying. I was
just having a little fun...

I think the newbies can draw their own conclusions. After all, they
can see how the newbie Schizoid Man was treated, and it happened
within a couple of months of his entrance here.

Thanks for laying it all out so concisely.