"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
Arny Krueger wrote:
"Marc Phillips" wrote in message
Arny said:
"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
And above, we have yet the latest example of Krueger's delusional
fantasies about sockpuppets. He, of course, repeats this lie
frequently without any proof to support his lies.
OK Bruce, where is your proof for this claim that you made:
http://www.google.com/groups?selm=19...3%40ng-ck1.aol
.com
"It is worth noting that Kruger has now adopted this despicable
tactic (i.e. questioning the validity of another's identity and
credentials) - solely as a diversionary tactic to try and disguise
the attack that he elected to start a series of personal attacks
against me gratuitously. Of
course, his sockpuppet henchman, Haugen, paved the way for him."
Bruce Richman, I challenge you to post your indisputable proof that
Haugen was actually my sockpuppet.
He's not saying that Doug Haugen was YOUR sockpuppet.
What's unclear about "...his sockpuppet..."?
He's saying that Doug was your henchman AND a sockpuppet.
That's not what he said. I reproduced it above, in context.
What's unclear about "...his sockpuppet..."?
If this were an isolated event..
What about this post:
http://www.google.com/groups?selm=20...8%40mb-m25.aol
.com
"The above paragraph should be enteitled "How To Put A Negative Spin
on Damaging
and Relevant Information" - by Arny "the sockpuppet and pathological
liar" Krueger. "
Here Richman claims that I'm a sockpuppet. This should amuse you
Philips, given that you've bragged about stalking me in my house. So
Phillips you stalk sockpuppets in their imaginary houses? LOL!
That, it and of itself, is easy to prove.
What about this posts that claims that "tor b" is one of my
sockpuppets:
http://www.google.com/groups?selm=20...9%40mb-m27.aol
.com
please notice the post's title
Then there is always:
http://www.google.com/groups?selm=20...6%40mb-m13.aol
.com
"Sockpuppet and liar Krueger, your inability to tell the truth is
once again in
evidence."
...and there are many more examples in google of Richman's
delusional claims about me and sockpuppets.
Learn to read, pervert.
Yes, you should learn to read Phillips, and yes you are a pervert
as you've demonstrated here many times.
All of the above represents just another pathetic attempt by Krueger
to avoid responsibility for making yet another set of pathological,
delusional lies.
Wrong. The pathological delusional lies are clearly identified as to their
source - BJ Richman.
It is, of course, obvious that on the subject of
why he chose to attack me for posting a joke - without provocation -
this coward has nothing to say.
Notice that BJ Richman tries to pass his hypocritical behavior as a joke.
How typical that Krueger would
simply try and change the subject as a diversionary tactic rather
than admit that he made yet another unprovoked attack on a post which
had nothing to do with him.
Notice that Richman wants you to believe that a post titled " Graphic
Krueger joke!" has nothing to do with me.
LOL!