AudioBanter.com - View Single Post - Dan Rather - Michael Moore, Same Source? Too good to be true

S O'Neill
No, they become ANOTHER story. And that one is about bogus documents.
The AWOL fact remains, and keeps its significance, with the added
feature that a misdirection was attempted (and you bit).

The fact is without the bogus evidence they didn't have enough of story
to even run it, for a major news organization it would have been laughable.
They *needed* the lies to justify running the story.

Clearly political Bias was being expressed in presenting false documents
to prove the case (which should have been debunked) and false testimony by
Democrat activists to prove the case (who were on the public record
contradicting themsleves already, so that should have been debunked as well).
They ended up with no credible testimony or documents to prove their
accusation.

Fruit of the poison tree as they say in the legal profession.

Will Miho
NY Music & TV Audio Guy
Off the Morning Show! & sleepin' In... / Fox News
"The large print giveth and the small print taketh away..." Tom Waits