AudioBanter.com - View Single Post

In article ,
ospam (WillStG) wrote:

WIllStG:
But Clinton's lies didn't bother you, right? Because he
*had to* lie, the holy cause of a Democratic Presidency might have been
compromised had he told the truth, he lied for a good cause right?

Brendan:
Where the hell does he get off assuming that these preposterous
statements represent my views - needing only to be confirmed by him by
asking "right?"

So the Lady doth protests. And then in the very next post Brendan
writes...

Lady? What lady? My wife would be surprised at that statement. I notice
you've studiously avoided responding to my calling you on your dishonest
"debating" tactics. Hit a nerve, eh?

The difference is that what Clinton lied about getting a blow job -
which had NOTHING WHATSOEVER to do with how he was running the country,
and was NOBODY'S BUSINESS but his, his family's, and Monica Lewinsky's.
Not my business, not your business, and not the Congress's business. The
whole thing was based on illegally obtained evidence, and was an
illegitimate witch hunt from the start."

But where the hell do I get off asking you rhetorically, "You didn't
care about Clinton's lies, did you?"

Pah. You are an apologist when it suits your politics.

Just stating the facts, fella. Pah, yourself. Yes, where the hell do you
get off putting words in other peoples mouths, as you construct
uninformed fantasy "wacko" personas for each person that takes issue
with your often preposterous and easily refutable assertions.

I've noticed that you just can't STAND not to have the last word in
every discussion. Well, here's your chance, as I will be away from
computers for an extended period starting in a few hours, and will be
mercifully unaware of your inevitable vitriolic retort. Spew at will. Or
rather, from Will...

--
Brendan Doyle