andrewunix wrote:

: I find this somewhat ironic.

There's no irony there. The intellectual property is the music
itself, not its sound quality.

It could be an "and" rather than a "not". Musicians are not the only
ones that have copyrights that are infringed on, nor the only one having
ideal rights.

agreenbu @ nyx . net andrew michael greenburg


Kind regards

Peter Larsen

--
*******************************************
* My site is at: http://www.muyiovatki.dk *
*******************************************