Lionel wrote:


Bruce J. Richman a écrit :
Lionel wrote:



Bruce J. Richman a écrit :

George M. Middius wrote:




Clyde Slick said:



I think Mikey has no choice but to quietly
ride off into the sunset. Eventually, we
will see that happen.

That will never happen by choice. There's a disconnect here between what
a
sane person would feel in Mikey's position and what Mikey actually does
feel. He doesn't feel humiliated, embarassed, or ashamed. A sane person
probably would feel one or all of those. The evidence has revealed
deliberate falsehoods and a lame coverup, both serving a master plan of
character assassination. But Mikey doesn't see anything wrong with his
behavior. This behavior *is* his norm. In fact, the continuing barrage of
argumentation, rebuttals, and insults serves his needs wonderfully -- all
he needs is to be noticed.

Deep down, even Mikey knows he's nothing but a skid mark on the
underpants
of life.

On the other hand we are nearly sure that McKelvy would have the
"courage" to discuss and to debate his behaviour in his non-usenet
life... For my part I highly doubt that "George M. Middius" is able of
the same "easiness" and vehemence in his (her ?) real life than on Usenet.




There are a couple of points of clarification, Lionel :

(1) The post to which you responded above was not written by me, but by
George
M. Middius and Art Sackman.

No need to be clarify

(2) McKelvy has been encouraged to submit his complaints about somebody
impersonating a psychologist to the legal authorities in Florida, since
public
impersonation of a licensed psychologist is a crime in the US. He's also
been
encouraged to publish his libelous false statements about me in an American
print publication. If he does either one of these things, he'll definitely
get
a chance to debate and discuss his delusional, libelous views in public
.......... in a courtroom. So far, he has not exhibited the courage to do
so.

This wasn't really my point but...

I have already told you that, IMHO the way you use to pour out your
professional "opinions" on a public NG doesn't honor you nor your
profession and, still IMHO, this strangely make me think to the
character assassination you pretend to denounce in McKelvy behaviour.

IMHO this is incompatible with the deontology, the professional ethic.

I don't pretend to be original, I am not the first one to tell you that
on this forum, just the first "hamas lover". )

Bruce J. Richman



You're wrong, of course, Because I happen to be a psychologist, that does not
mean that I can't express my opinions about the behavior of others here, just
like everybody else does. Despite numerous false claims by Krueger and Mckelvy
that I've attempted to diagnose their abnormal behavior on RAO, there is no
evidence to support that lie. They just use that provfable lie to try and
prevent exposure of their character assassination campaigns.

Re.; my describing you as a "hamas lover", that was an opinion based on your
comparisons of Sharon to Sheik Yassin, the late Hamas leader that was
personally responsible for ordering numerous suicide bomber attacks upon
civilians. IMHO, there is a big difference between giving orders to blow up
school buses and restaurants populated by civilians, and giving orders to kill
known militants. Granted, civilians unfortunately get killed in wars, but only
one side has made a habit of ordering that type of activity.

Perhaps now that Arafat is no longer around, there will be a legitimate attempt
on both sides to make peace. Time will tell.

Bruce J. Richman