Bruce J. Richman a écrit :
Lionel wrote:



Bruce J. Richman a écrit :

George M. Middius wrote:




Clyde Slick said:



I think Mikey has no choice but to quietly
ride off into the sunset. Eventually, we
will see that happen.

That will never happen by choice. There's a disconnect here between what a
sane person would feel in Mikey's position and what Mikey actually does
feel. He doesn't feel humiliated, embarassed, or ashamed. A sane person
probably would feel one or all of those. The evidence has revealed
deliberate falsehoods and a lame coverup, both serving a master plan of
character assassination. But Mikey doesn't see anything wrong with his
behavior. This behavior *is* his norm. In fact, the continuing barrage of
argumentation, rebuttals, and insults serves his needs wonderfully -- all
he needs is to be noticed.

Deep down, even Mikey knows he's nothing but a skid mark on the underpants
of life.

On the other hand we are nearly sure that McKelvy would have the
"courage" to discuss and to debate his behaviour in his non-usenet
life... For my part I highly doubt that "George M. Middius" is able of
the same "easiness" and vehemence in his (her ?) real life than on Usenet.




There are a couple of points of clarification, Lionel :

(1) The post to which you responded above was not written by me, but by George
M. Middius and Art Sackman.

No need to be clarify

(2) McKelvy has been encouraged to submit his complaints about somebody
impersonating a psychologist to the legal authorities in Florida, since public
impersonation of a licensed psychologist is a crime in the US. He's also been
encouraged to publish his libelous false statements about me in an American
print publication. If he does either one of these things, he'll definitely get
a chance to debate and discuss his delusional, libelous views in public
.......... in a courtroom. So far, he has not exhibited the courage to do so.

This wasn't really my point but...

I have already told you that, IMHO the way you use to pour out your
professional "opinions" on a public NG doesn't honor you nor your
profession and, still IMHO, this strangely make me think to the
character assassination you pretend to denounce in McKelvy behaviour.

IMHO this is incompatible with the deontology, the professional ethic.

I don't pretend to be original, I am not the first one to tell you that
on this forum, just the first "hamas lover". )

Bruce J. Richman