Michael McKelvy wrote:
"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Clyde Slick wrote:
"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Clyde Slick wrote:
"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
arthlink.net...
"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...
Did you listen to Arny's recording? What did you think of
the material? What did you think of the performance?
Is that your idea of music?
No, I haven't listened to the recording.
Give it a try.
Please.
He's been much too busy trying to support Krueger's deliberate
deception
and
pretending that you didn't ask him this before. His latest fabrication
was
that you were asking the "public" to listen to the recording. He and
Krueger
are now engaged in one of their little folie-a-deux-type mutual lie
marathons.
What is it about "A Question for Mike McKelvey" that
Mike McKelvey can't understand?
Well, there are seveal possible explanations for his bizarre and - as we
can
all expect - dishonest behavior.
(1) Seeing an unprovoked personal attack from his controller, Krueger, his
conditioned Attack & Lie Responce in Support of Krueger (TM) kicked in and
totally blocked out all other alternatives - such as a rational response.
Says the guy that makes unprovoked personal attack in a thread about the
death of Julian Hirsch.
A blatant lie.
(2) The title of your thread and the questoni
Is that Italian?
Evasive grasping at typographical error because of inability to respond
honestly noted. Slavish imitation of role model Krueger's juvenile
typographical error citing noted.
were both clearly stated.
Responding directly to it would have interfered with Mikey's reputation
for
blatant disregard for the facts in a post.
I did respond when I read it. I've seen a question about a recording, I've
not listened to it.
You also engaged in an unprovoked personal attack against me rather then answer
the question and stick to the facts. Of course, your mindless and slavish need
to ingratiate yourself with Krueger is well known to all of us.
(3) Honest questions - when directed to McKelvy - don't get honest
answers.
And honest questions about why you posted a personal attack in the Julian
Hirsch thread get no answer at all.
Since the premise was dishonest and based on lies, the question was equally
dishonest and not worthy of response.
Here's an honest question for you, liar. Why haven't you at least asked for
an investigation by the legal authorities in Florida of the person you have
repeatedly alleged may be impersonating a psychologist named Dr. Richman?
I would think both the authorities and the real Dr. Richman would like to see
this "impersonator" prosecuted for engaging in behavior that is clearly against
the law.
Bruce J. Richman
|