"ludovic mirabel" elmir2m @pacificcoast.net wrote in message
...

"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
k.net...

"ludovic mirabel" elmir2m @pacificcoast.net wrote in message
...
Good question deserves courteous answer. It means to ME that as long as
most people are not bothered trying to remember what they heard before
to compare with what they are hearing now they can concentrate properly
on what their auditory nerves are conveying to their brains. The result
is "I like this one" and "No, I don't like this one"

That is what it means to me. If you want to know what it means to Sean
Olive you'll have to ask him. I'm only reporting.

Of course as I said before I would love to see one of your "many"
references to positive DBT/ABX tests by most of a panel of say 10
audiophiles. If, as you say, you have no time to find all of them just
quote two to begin with.
After all there must be SOME comparable audio components out there that
will sound different to a small panel.

Even when they are ABXing.


The only ones I've heard about dealt with Tube amps.

Tubes are just fine. Any audiocomponents at all- but give references at
last
Next you ask for the third time.

Sorry but since I'm not interested in tube amps and already know what I need
to about ABX and DBT's relating to audio, I don't save such things.
It was several years ago that I read about the instance I was referring to.
I don't believe they would have met your criteria for a panel of listeners.




Were the FR's of the speakers that Mr. Olive used similar?

The question was answered by me 2 days ago in this thread
"Sean Olive ( Mr. Toole's cowoorker) had 300 listeners listen double blind
to 4 loudspeakers two of which had * ragged* frequency range"Mr. McKelvy I
am not your librarian and I am not Sean Olive's spokesman.

Sorry, I do recall reading that bit.

..I advised you before to read
his article and/or contact him if you have a problem following a simple
enough text.

If you have it post it. I don't see any need to pay for a JAES paper on a
subject that is pretty much dead for me.

This is
getting very tedious. No more correspondence till you produce some of your
"many" references to POSITIVE ABX test. RegardsLudovic Mirabel

Promise?