"Michael McKelvy" wrote in
message
k.net...

"ludovic mirabel" elmir2m @pacificcoast.net
wrote in message
...
Good question deserves courteous answer. It
means to ME that as long as most people are not
bothered trying to remember what they heard
before to compare with what they are hearing
now they can concentrate properly on what their
auditory nerves are conveying to their brains.
The result is "I like this one" and "No, I
don't like this one"

That is what it means to me. If you want to
know what it means to Sean Olive you'll have to
ask him. I'm only reporting.

Of course as I said before I would love to see
one of your "many" references to positive
DBT/ABX tests by most of a panel of say 10
audiophiles. If, as you say, you have no time
to find all of them just quote two to begin
with.
After all there must be SOME comparable audio
components out there that will sound different
to a small panel.

Even when they are ABXing.


The only ones I've heard about dealt with Tube
amps.

Tubes are just fine. Any audiocomponents at all-
but give references at last
Next you ask for the third time.

Were the FR's of the speakers that Mr. Olive
used similar?

The question was answered by me 2 days ago in this
thread
"Sean Olive ( Mr. Toole's cowoorker) had 300
listeners listen double blind to 4 loudspeakers
two of which had * ragged* frequency range"Mr.
McKelvy I am not your librarian and I am not Sean
Olive's spokesman. .I advised you before to read
his article and/or contact him if you have a
problem following a simple enough text.This is
getting very tedious. No more correspondence till
you produce some of your "many" references to
POSITIVE ABX test. RegardsLudovic Mirabel
__________________________________________________ _________________________________________________M cKelvy
Dec 16+