"Michael McKelvy" wrote in
ink.net:


"Rich.Andrews" wrote in message
...
"Michael McKelvy" wrote in
nk.net:


"TCS" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 14:23:24 -0800, Schizoid Man
wrote:
... if you have less than $80,000 to spend on a music system?

There's no reason to read sterophile if as rich as bill gates or
anything in between.

There is no correlation between equipment being well made and clean
sounding
and a good review in sterophile.

These clowns even thought the tice clock worked!

And when they do measure tweaks like Atkinson did with green pens and
such, and the measurements don't show anything happening, they still
insist that they should be used because one or more of the
knuckleheads that used them said he heard magic.



I make note of which writers keeps ****iki stones and other nonsense
listed. That way I know which reviewer is full of it and which one
might actually be worth reading.

r

Is it a really short list for the latter?



Since the list of reviewers/writers is short anyway, a subset would be
shorter yet.

I know of one off the top of my head. There may be a few more whom I feel
I cannot trust to give the correct time of day let alone a proper review.
Things however are rarely black or white. I still find that reviewer
entertaining sometimes. Maybe I am easily entertained. (:)

r