Look at the theorem from Nyquist in mathematical form. You are spewing BS.

"Sasa [Sason] Miocic" wrote in message
...

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
CD players use tricks to smooth out the waveform at high frequencies
because of the fewer sampling points there.

Irrelevant and wrong.

There are no tricks, just proven technology.

What technology? Assigning voltage to a time point?

As long as there are slightly more than two sampling points, the
reconstruction of amplitude and phase is near-perfect.

Yes, near perfect, or maybe harsh? Tell me how are you gonna discribe sine
wave with 2 sample points? You can't, it is gonna be a triangle wave. So
higher the freqs on CD, sharper they become. Thats why more sample points
are needed in high-end audio. And if you have good speakers, you can
really,
maybe not actually hear the difference, but feel the difference between
44.1kHz and 96kHz sampling rate. I would discribe it as a more open,
brilliant, sparkling, fresh full airy sound. You can laugh but it's true


Furthermore in CD audio, that happens at or above 22.05 KHz, which is
way
more than people can hear the absence of in a musical/voice context.

True that we cannot "hear" above 22k or below 20Hz. But have you ever
"felt"
15Hz? Psicho acoustics are playing with that kind of problems.