I gather that Sean Olive's test results upset you. If new experimental evidence always agreed with what looks like common sense to the annika1's of this world who could be bothered experimenting?
Or have you better experimental evidence?
Ludovic Mirabel
"Annika1980" wrote in message ...
Conclusion: Being "tested" makes your performance worse.

Bull****. That's like saying that I have 20/20 vision except whem I'm looking
at an eye chart. Or I'm the greatest golfer in the world, unless you keep
score.

Assuming that some folks test better than others (a fair assumption, I think),
why not simply confine your testing to those who test well? The whole point of
the challenge is to find ANYONE who can hear the claimed differences.
Stereopile should bring their Golden Ears to the table.
I'll hold my breath while they squirm.