On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 10:23:05 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

"JBorg" wrote in message
.com
Arny Krueger wrote
JBorg" wrote



If our empirical senses are faulty,

That's a scientific fact, which is well known.

If our senses were not faulty there would be no need for microscopes
or telephones.

what would be an example of a
properly controlled listening "test" which would circumvent this
problem ?

Please see www.pcabx.com for examples.

Please see Dr. Corbett's commentary about pcabx dated 11/27/04, RAO

Good idea. It shows what happens if one becomes obsessed with details, and
loses the ability to figuratively see the forest for the trees.

I see that none of the RAO trolls are bright enough to see the rather gross
flaws in Corbett's little study.

Let me also recommend the following:

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/AS...534735-0115334

Thanks for the recommendation. Looks like a great read.

BTW, god lies in the details, right? Or are you saying the God is just
lying?