McKelvy said:

That should be cause for concern. It also seems to confirm
that which you were so upset about. Looks like Michael Moore pegged our
nation's people. Why were you so upset about it?

I'm not upset by that in and of itself. It's the sneering, smarmy, way he
looks down his nose at those who don't buy his jaundiced views. It's also
his dishonesty. If what he believes is true he should be able to make his
case much more honestly, with out the editing. I've not read any objective
critique of his work that finds his methods to honest or even making a
pretense at objectivity.

That's funny, because people have been offering instances of objective
critiques of his work to you for weeks now. In fact, someone did it today.

No wonder you think there's nothing wrong with Arny. You see what you want
to
see.

Boon



They were meant for each other.

I have it on good authority from a confidential source who contacted me via
telegraph (morse code) that McKelvy used to be employed as a polygraph tester.
Unfortunately, they had to let him go after finding out that every time they
hooked hm up to the various physiological indices, and aske him to answer some
questions, he blew the circuits and sent all the measurements off the charts.



Bruce J. Richman