"Law of Storms" wrote in message
...
Michael McKelvy wrote:

There is evidence that Shrub drank quite a lot, by self-admission.


But we don't know what his subjective estimation of quite a lot is.

Not really relevant. When a man says he drinks too much and has to make a
life changing decision to stop, you can bet it wasn't a martini after
dinner then home to bed.


I don't suspect it was, but there's no way to know what he meant by too
much. Coulda been a 6 pack a day, could been a case. One mans idea of too
much is not necessarily the same as another's. Just glad to see he got over
it.

You say the talk of Shrub's

cocaine habit is just vapor, but you toss in what you claim is certain
knowledge that Kerry used drugs at Vail.

That does not compute.


Trevor thinks we should by into his firmly enshrined belief that Bush is
addled from drugs and alcohol. I simply offered up some information I
have from eyewitnesses to Kerry's drug use when he was hanging out in
Vail. It worth every bit as much as Trevor's conviction. Nothing.

I affirm that Bush is quite addled, but haven't a clue to its origin.

More correctly, you beleive it.

Excessive alcohol consumption alone can lead to
considerable nerve and brain damage and dysfunction.

Look at Teddy Kennedy, I'd wager he had more booze and more time than Dubya
ever did. I remember a gag ad in National Lampoon. A take off on those old
VW bug commercials. It showed a VW floating in a lake with the caption: "If
Ted Kennedy had been driving a Volkswagon, he'd be President."

You claim to have eyewitnesses. Trevor does not.

Both claims are still meaningless at the end of the day.


The burden of proof is now upon you to cough up these witnesses. After
all, Kewrry still holds a seat as Senator, and the people have a right to
know.

If the people wanted to come forward tehy'd have done so.

You could be on Fox!

Bigh whoop!

Maybe one of th ebleached blonde babes will interview you!

I'll hold out for Paula Zahn.