Michael McKelvy wrote:
There is evidence that Shrub drank quite a lot, by self-admission.
But we don't know what his subjective estimation of quite a lot is.
Not really relevant. When a man says he drinks too much and
has to make a life changing decision to stop, you can bet it
wasn't a martini after dinner then home to bed.
You say the talk of Shrub's
cocaine habit is just vapor, but you toss in what you claim is certain
knowledge that Kerry used drugs at Vail.
That does not compute.
Trevor thinks we should by into his firmly enshrined belief that Bush is
addled from drugs and alcohol. I simply offered up some information I have
from eyewitnesses to Kerry's drug use when he was hanging out in Vail. It
worth every bit as much as Trevor's conviction. Nothing.
I affirm that Bush is quite addled, but haven't a clue to
its origin. Excessive alcohol consumption alone can lead to
considerable nerve and brain damage and dysfunction.
You claim to have eyewitnesses. Trevor does not.
The burden of proof is now upon you to cough up these
witnesses. After all, Kewrry still holds a seat as Senator,
and the people have a right to know.
You could be on Fox!
Maybe one of th ebleached blonde babes will interview you!
--
Law of Storms
"My God, it's full of stars..."
|