"MZ" wrote in message
...

Once again, I'll point out your fallacy. Your entire argument must assert
one of two things:
1) distortion is present in the output of the amplifier - enough to exceed
human thresholds of detection; OR
2) while there's no distortion present, one can still hear the difference.

You're implying that (some) amplifiers are perfect. There is no such thing.
*All* amplifiers output a distorted signal. If the testing equipment can't
detect this, then the error is with the testing equipment.

You've already rejected #2 in your reply to Eddie Runner in this thread. So
you are therefore claiming that #1 is the case.

No I'm not. See above. However, it's perfectly feasible that some amplifiers
output a signal that is below the threshold of human hearing to detect
distortion, and also below the threshold of current measuring devices.

Yet, when one measures the
distortion content of the two amplifiers, there's none to be found
(certainly far less than what is audible to humans).

Which is it? None, or less that what is audible to humans? Again, if you can't
measure distortion, then your equipment isn't good enough. Again, there is no
such thing as a perfect amplifier. Hell, there is no such thing as a perfect
*wire*. The signal will change.

Your reasoning has been that the test equipment is wrong. That's a cop out
if I've ever heard one. Measuring voltage is not rocket science.

Measuring voltage to infinite limits is beyond rocket science.

It's incredibly easy to do, and it's incredibly precise. The fact that you
don't
realize this implies that you don't do much electronics work and so you
never have the opportunity to deal with these devices yourself.

The fact that you keep saying the same thing without understanding what the
*actual* problem is implies that you've already made your mind up about this
years ago, without bothering to consider anything new.