paul packer wrote:
On Tue, 02 Nov 2004 17:01:59 +0200, Fella wrote:

since I've
been living with myself for 58 years and I hadn't yet learned all
that.

It sometimes takes an outsider to see the insides, if you get what I
mean. No but wait. You wouldn't get what I mean. Ok.




Well, I don't know,


Well, at least you know _that_. So there is some potential.


you seem to be doing a pretty good job so far in
your own opinion. Do please continue.

Well thank you masseh, for the permission granted.


Now, now, don't be boring and repeat things over and over.

Ok so when'd I say I was perfect?



Thank you. But how do you know?


You can hear the difference between a rotel, was it, and a marantz or
another. Read some of the *articles* you *posted*, remember?


Is that an instruction or an expectation?


Both. I am giving you some medicine, feel free to take it anyway you
want it.


I thought that was a post. Like this one. I thought articles were what
one submitted to magazines.


Well back to the old thesaurus for you then.


Nope. Think I'll just check my thesaurus. The one I fish words from
all the time.


Ok, and, yes, what a surprise that would be.



Please don't write my dialogue for me. And certainly not in that
peculiar Huckleberry Finn dialect.

Sorry me then, I should have fished a fancy word for "enlighten" from
your thesaurus. Ok, lets see:

"acculturate, acquaint, cultivate, edify, educate, ennoble, enrich,
foster, help forward, indoctrinate, inform, instruct" .. So, pick one.