I usually do not top post. But for an exceptional "get-a-brain-moran"
such as yourself, I'll make an exception: Your science is limited, your
understanding of the depths of the human ear perception is limited, your
measurements are limited, your so called listening tests are limited, a
flat frequency response does not even begin to tell the story when it
comes to *music* (NOT pink noise) .. etc.

And who am I telling all this to? A "get-a-brain-moran" .. Sheeeeeeesh,
I should get a brain..




Michael McKelvy wrote:
"Fella" wrote in message
...

paul packer wrote:


On Tue, 02 Nov 2004 09:52:01 +0200, Fella wrote:



paul packer wrote:


On Mon, 01 Nov 2004 16:06:09 +0200, Fella wrote:





And perhaps they might *know* their mother tounge better then this
mikey boy.


I think that's "tongue". Also "better than". .

Typos will be typos. Is that asking "to much"?

Besides, english is definitely not my mother tongue.


You mean your mother tounge, don't you?

No, I mean tongue. Listen, you be gettin on my nerves boi.. I be slappin
you silly if yous gunna keep this up.

Anyways .


Anyways????????????// Argh! Anyway.

. I do not pretend to know .. or rather, I do not deem that

thousands of different equipment all over the world are "malfunctioning"
based on crude, borg-like, limited preconceptions and misconceptions.


How about base on numerous meansurements and listnening comparisons?


And this about equipment I've never even heard, or heard of (!) much less
measured.

If I would boast such god like qualities, well, perhaps then I shouldn't
be making typos either. Now, taking spare time work and writing a quick


It's not God like abilities, it's science.


two or three articles here, just for the sake of contribution, I make a
typo here and there in the process, I repeat the question: is that asking
"to much" ???


Way too much.


There are some know-it-all bots lurking around here, like ferstler, the
retard mikey boy, you(?) (never read a single article of yours, figures...
since you *do* seem to be some sort of a bore), the patronizing idiot
krooger, etc, who think that equipped with some pink noise and an
oscilloscope they can put out instructions as to what a standart CD
player, amp, lamp cord speaker cable, etc, should be. In the


Thanks for demonstrating that facts mean nothing to you. Proof! Who needs
proof?


process these fruitcakes call other people "delusional" etc, and act
god-like.



It's not acting God like to understnad the thresholds of human hearing and
know that the measurements and listening comparisons mean what they mean.
Properly functioining CD players not designed to alter the Frequency
response from flat, sound the same as each other.


It's just satisfying, and nice, and funny, and OK and lets off some steem
to ridicule such folk.


If you get your kicks by making statements that don't reflect the reality of
the science of audio, it's you who set yourself up for ridicule.