On Tue, 02 Nov 2004 17:01:59 +0200, Fella wrote:

paul packer wrote:
On Tue, 02 Nov 2004 13:43:23 +0200, Fella wrote:


There are some know-it-all bots lurking around here, like ferstler, the
retard mikey boy, you(?) (never read a single article of yours,
figures... since you *do* seem to be some sort of a bore)


There's some interesting logic lurking here. In what way do I deserve
to be lumped with Ferstler, McKelvy and Krueger?

Like I said I haven't read any of the *articles* that you might have
posted on RAO up to now.

But went through some 10-15 of your articles just now, and found you to
be vain, smug, patronizing, argumentative, and mostly demogogic. your
vain, patronizing attitude and the way you throw fished-from-a-thesaurus
words around indicate that you are after some sort of a compensation for
your "exceptional mediocrity" (oxymoron? No, not inyour case.) ...

Well, it's definitely time for Mr. Richman to be brought in here to
see how well your amateur psychology stands up to scrutiny. I'm
astonished you can glean so much from a few posts on RAO, since I've
been living with myself for 58 years and I hadn't yet learned all
that. I'm extremely grateful for your psycholanalysis. What is the
fee, please? (And don't be modest. You deserve a just reward).

By the way, you said "vain" and "patronizing" twice. And I'll have you
know my mediocrity is in no way "exceptional". It is, unfortunately,
quite commonplace.

All this makes you a bit of a bore, a some sort of a bore, that is, you
*are* boring, yes, no doubt about that, but you make it hard for
sensible people to pin you down.

Well, I don't know, you seem to be doing a pretty good job so far in
your own opinion. Do please continue.

But yes, you *can* be "lumped" with the
ferstler, krooger, etc, bunch, since you are, in the end, a bore, read:
boooooooriiing..

Now, now, don't be boring and repeat things over and over.

You don't have wood for ears though.

Thank you. But how do you know?

In what way does my
being 'some sort of a bore' (whatever that may mean)

Read above. And dully snap back with some snappy question for an answer,
thank you.

Is that an instruction or an expectation?

preclude my
writing an 'article' (whatever that may be)?

An article is what one posts on a newsgroup in the usenet.

I thought that was a post. Like this one. I thought articles were what
one submitted to magazines.

Now, if you
would like more clarification and definitions as to what might be a
"newsgroup", a "post", or the "usenet" etc, then I suggest you dully
snap back with a smug little question,

Nope. Think I'll just check my thesaurus. The one I fish words from
all the time.

clipping all else essential and
quoting some minor detail, as in: "usenet, do enlighten us fella, what
might be this usenet?"

Please don't write my dialogue for me. And certainly not in that
peculiar Huckleberry Finn dialect.