"Schizoid Man" wrote in message
...

"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message

"Schizoid Man" wrote in message

No, that's just your own ass. I have never claimed that Bush was
personally responsible for the job growth we currently have, or that
Clinton
was personally responsible for the recession that started during his
term.

Presidents do not have that power, they can only submit a budget to
Congress
which either passes it or not.

No President has ever had any personal blame or responsibility for the
economic situation.

There is no doubt things would be far worse for the economy if the tax
cuts
proposed by Bush and passed by Congress had not been passed.

No President creates or destroys jobs or has any influence on what type
of
jobs come into existence.

See Robert Samuelson's article at
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...2004Sep14.html to
get
an explanation on this.

How about telling the truth on this subject for a change?

If you're peeved about the earlier (mis?)chracterizartion of your views, I
suggest that you take it up with the person who wrote it.

I have been nothing, if not truthful. Sure, I am a biased - but I have
never
denied being so. Please point out exactly what lies I have spread about
you.
Once again, I was not the author of that post.


So it was not you who wrote this?

This article proves beyond doubt that Michael McKelvy is not the true,
classical conservative that he claims to be, but simply a partisan hack. Or
perhaps, in more erudite terms, a Republican attack dog.

I can sum it up for you. The well-known magazine American Conservative has
endorsed John Kerry for President because: "George W. Bush has come to
embody a politics that is antithetical to almost any kind of thoughtful
conservatism."