"Rich.Andrews" wrote in message . 1...
"Robert Morein" wrote in news:jp6dnStrEMNyyfXcRVn-
:

From sci.electronics.design,

"Not much progress in RF since 1938 ... The RF industry has finally
come (up?) to the level of the pro-audio specialty devices:

http://www.j-walk.com/other/wifispray/

Frank Raffaeli
http://www.aomwireless.com/
"




Anyone who say there hasn't been much progress in RF since 1938 is
horribly mistaken.

That statement is so wrong on so many levels I don't know where to begin.

r

I think the speed spray could work for cheap audio cables, yes? Why
spend all that money on precious metals and inert gasses?

Maybe I shouldn't give away my ideas for free ... ;-)

Seriously, Rich, I can understand why you said what you said. There
certainly is a lot of marketing hype about RF. Perhaps there have been
some advancements, but they are mainly cosmetic, rather than
substantive. Certainly, much of the electronics is smaller and
cheaper. I guess a cell phone would have been a bit cumbersome in
1938, but you could have used it as a space-heater ...

Frank Raffaeli
http://www.aomwireless.com/