AudioBanter.com - View Single Post

(Bruce J. Richman) said:

I thought, however, that Luxman was considered higher quality than
Yamaha, that Yamaha was more mass-market than Luxman ... not so?

Depends which Luxman. I bought an L200 ('82-84) on Ebay which has a
beautiful sweet, warm sound. Then I bought an R104 receiver ('85/86)
which is total crap sound-wise. Both have duo-beta circuitry but the
difference couldn't be more marked. Beware.

Utter audiophool bull****, note. You MUST be deluded.
All decent amplifiers sound the SAME, be it a '49 Williamson or a
$150 Sony.

Next you'll tell us that Mpingo disks and CD demagnetizers actually
work.
Haw haw haw!

Prove it.

At least, it's not like any decent Yamaha can be falling apart in a
proper double blind test, Clyde.

Watch that humidity!

--
Sander deWaal
"SOA of a KT88? Sufficient."