Sockpuppet "give me a break" wrote:
In article ,
(Bruce J. Richman) writes:
Give me a break wrote:
In article ,
(Bruce J. Richman) writes:
Tim Brown wrote:
rec.audio.tech has more intellegent life than here.
TB
-----------------------------------------------------------
Contrary to the false claim made by Brown, the last sentence of his
response
indicates his lack of respect for the intelligence of the posters on
rec.audio.opinion. It is also totally unrelated to audio in any way.
Obviously, he has no evidence to back up his personal attacks re. the
intelligence of RAO posters. And by trying to pretend he wasn't leveling
a
personal insult at the members of RAO, he simply illustrates the type of
fraudulent behavior that he and Krueger are known for.
So a post that is 99% audio is a personal attack? And where does he
mention any "person"? I would think a personal attack would have to
either mention a specific person or persons, or followup a person's
post?
You are really reaching here and only displaying your own paranoia.
Thanks fror demonstrating that you support and engage in personal attacks.
The
last line of a post - and in fact, the only one that Brown even posted in
his
latest personal attack - is often one that readers remember. This
phenomenon
is covered under a perceptual rule known as the Law of Recency. Claiming
that
there is less intelligent life in RAO than in another news group is an
attack
similar to those that Brown's role model, Krueger, is known for.
But I ask again, where did he mention any person in this group? He
alluded to some people,
He impugned the intelligence of a large group of regular posters, similar to a
tactic employed by others whom he often joins in smear individuals - e. Krueger
&
Ferstler.
but no specific person was mentioned. How can
it be a personal attack if he did not mention one specific person?
You really have a strange definition of "personal attack".
Actually, much less strange than your transparent attempt to engage in labeling
people as paranoid with no evidence to suuprot your ridiculous satement. In
point of fact, your pathetic attempts to defame me are contradicted by massive
Google evidence in which Brown & Krueger's personal attacks against me and
others are documented.
And why
bring Krueger into this discussion? Can you not ever make a post
without bringing him up?
Another false inference you've drawn. In a very recent post, Krueger joined
Brown in a personal attack directly against me - in this same thread. It is in
the Google record. Why are you so determined to defend these 2 flamers by
making false claims about me?
Why the fixation on him?
Can't you tell the truth about your obvious suipport for Brown & Krueger?
Making silly statements about "fixations" with no evidence to back them up just
exposes you as having no credibility.
And how dare he
think there might be more intellegent life on another news group. But
then again, he did not actaully say there was no intellegent life
here, just more elsewhere.
Which was is way of smearing the group in general. And like you, he makes
statements without any facts to back them up.
Sounds like paranoia on your part again,
becuase I didn't see your name mentioned. Why the need to take it so
personal on your part?
Has your fixation with "paranoia" as evidenced by your lying about it been a
frequent tacting you've used to insult others, or am I fhe first you've
attempted to smear in this way? Don't bother to answer. You simiply don't
know what you're talking about when you throw around terms like this.
Your use of the term "paranoia" simply illustrates your ignorance and
desperation to smear others that actually know what terms like this mean.
So how better to demonstrate paranoia than to assume it was you he was
speaking of when your name was not mentioned? Please explain oh master
psychologist and inveterate libeler.
You are a chronic pathological liar, apparently, who likes to make meaningless
statements about others. Where's the evidence to support your self-serving
hokum?
For all we know, you could well be just another delusional sockpuppet created
by one of the few people that would be stupid enough to support your idiotic
statements - such as the two already mentioned.
Your flaming away in this thread helps to destroy your credibility. And your
choice of people to defend is also quite helpful in that regard. You're a
fool.
Bruce J. Richman