"dave weil" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 22:33:54 GMT, "Michael McKelvy"
wrote:

They also quoted a woman who they insisted was an average citizen, they
failed to identify her as an anti-draft activist.

You are *such* a liar. They said "But Beverly's not buying it. She's a
Republican, but also a single-issue voter".

That sounds ridiculous, the only single issue republicans I ever heard of
were the anti-abortion crowd.

I wasn't lieing, I was telling what they were saying on the news. Any
inaccuracies were unintentional.



That's hardly an "average
citizen". Not only that, but are you saying that if someone is
concerned enough to be a "single-issue voter", that they might not
naturally work toward that issue?

I didn't see the report, I passed on what was being said on the news. I
also posted the entire story so there would a chance for people to have it
all in context. That's hardly disingenous.

Are you being disingenuous by not identifying her as a Republican?
chuckle

You've been reading too many blog entries like this one:

I don't read any blogs.

My biggest problem with the whole deal is why were they running a story
about a non-issue?