On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 21:07:21 -0400, Howard Ferstler
wrote:


Otherwise, you'd be calling anyone who would spend $2600 more than
they need to for an amp a loser, a chump and a buzzkiller for the
hobby.

Obviously, people with lots of surplus cash need to have
something to spend it on. Big-ticket properties give their
lives meaning. Some people would never own a cheap watch or
cheap car, even though they might work just fine for what
watches and cars are supposed to do. They would want a Rolex
or a Lexus, and would not be satisfied with anything else.
That is not my style (cheap is my middle name), but who am I
to deny the rich the right to blow their cash on overkill?

Hmmmm, almost sounds like things I told you a few years ago. Glad to
hear that you're finally coming around.