"ansermetniac" wrote in message

On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 17:44:49 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

"ansermetniac" wrote in message

On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 15:28:17 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

"ansermetniac" wrote in message

As a designer of the highest quality of sax mouthpieces(I am the
acoustician and manufacturing engineer , my partner the mechanical
engineer) it appals me that CDs are eqd so badly. SO much so that
Digital is given the bad rap and not the incompetent mastering
engineers . These engineers have been listening to recorded music
for so long they haven't a clue as to what instruments realy sound
like.

Perhaps. These days music is made to sell to people who probably
fit your description better than the engineers do.

I offer mp3s of the week of rare classical records and concerts
remastered by me in sound that does not have the juiced mids and
highs of lps and CDs.

And the URL for downloading is??
http://members.aol.com/abbedd/abbedd

I like the music as music, but not as an example of good high
fidelity.

When reproduced over a modern system, these recordings tend to sound
nasal, raspy, lacking in presence, with too much upper bass and not
enough deep bass. I can't help but suspect that were they were
mastered based on listening with modern speakers, they'd sound quite
a bit different.



Arny

You have been listening to recorded music so long you don't know what
instruments sound like. Because you said " Lacking in presence" I know
I have been sucessful.

Try again. I do live recording of acoustic instruments and voices just about
every weekend.