View Single Post
  #14   Report Post  
Arny Krueger
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"ansermetniac" wrote in message

On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 15:28:17 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

"ansermetniac" wrote in message

As a designer of the highest quality of sax mouthpieces(I am the
acoustician and manufacturing engineer , my partner the mechanical
engineer) it appals me that CDs are eqd so badly. SO much so that
Digital is given the bad rap and not the incompetent mastering
engineers . These engineers have been listening to recorded music
for so long they haven't a clue as to what instruments realy sound
like.


Perhaps. These days music is made to sell to people who probably fit
your description better than the engineers do.


I offer mp3s of the week of rare classical records and concerts
remastered by me in sound that does not have the juiced mids and
highs of lps and CDs.


And the URL for downloading is??

http://members.aol.com/abbedd/abbedd


I like the music as music, but not as an example of good high fidelity.

When reproduced over a modern system, these recordings tend to sound nasal,
raspy, lacking in presence, with too much upper bass and not enough deep
bass. I can't help but suspect that were they were mastered based on
listening with modern speakers, they'd sound quite a bit different.