dave weil wrote:

On Thu, 09 Sep 2004 17:47:48 -0400, Howard Ferstler
wrote:

Trust me, Routledge (which is a branch of Taylor & Francis,
one of the largest publishers in the world) is not about to
let a plagiarizer put material into one of their books. The
plagiarism thing (and its supposed seriousness as presented
on this pint-sized, often dysfunctional chat group) is more
a phantom of your mind than anything that would trouble a
major publisher.

Actually, this isn't true at all. It was *not* a "phantom of your
mind" but a real issue.

Only in the mind of a bunch of RAO tweakos.

The only way that you will convince me otherwise is if you didn't have
to alter the article that you were so proud of. If the *published*
Peter Walker entry matches what you posted here originally (the one
that had the almost unchanged verbiage from the Quad website), I'll
admit that apparently it was "no big deal".

I changed it to make you happy, Dave.

BTW, let me know when the "USENET audio wacko" article comes out so I
can send my letter to the editor noting this very issue.

Stay tuned and on the edge of that seat of yours, Dave.

Howard Ferstler