Marc Phillips wrote:
Howard said:
Marc Phillips wrote:
I doubt it. I continue to publish bi-monthly, and that's with a day
job.
Religious tracts do not count, slick, nor do posts on RAO.
You know, when you left here in disgrace for plagiarizing,
I left, because you people are more interested in malarkey
than in audio. However, nothing lasts forever, and I assumed
that maybe some newcomers were now on hand to read and
learn. That they might be "learning" something from you
"doofii" (that's plural for doofus) prompted me to come back
and box your collective ears for a while.
You left because you were caught plagiarizing. You left, by your own
admission, because the outcry was too over whelming for you. You were
embarassed and ashamed. So were you lying then, or are you lying now?
As I stated in another thread, no major publisher would
publish material that was plagiarized. (I assume that you
goofballs joined John Atkinson in contacting my publisher
about my "crimes.") The publisher, Routledge, is a branch of
Taylor & Francis, one of the biggest publishing outfits in
the world, and they not only were happy with my work but
actually contacted me a bit later about doing still another
book. I passed on that, because a similar and very good book
on the subject they wanted dealt with had already been
published in several editions over the years. They did tell
me that they would be in touch about new projects in time.
In any case, you pinheads clearly overrate your impact on
the real world.
I was under the
impression that you and I wouldn't need to have this conversation over and
over
anymore. So how stupid are you?
Smart enough to be successfully boxing your ears, doofus.
You're not boxing my ears. I am here to tell you that as long as you think
it's okay to come back here and post your drivel, I think it's okay to
continually remind people that you were drummed out of here for plagiarizing.
Drummed out of here? Give me a break, doofus. Nobody gets
"drummed out of here" on RAO. Hell, you are still here, and
in spite of you being a doofus, it appears you will be
staying on for quite a while.
I left to renovate my home (and announced a reduction in
writing work in a TSS column to that effect), with the
project still not completed. Almost, though, and so I am
ramping up my writing work almost to pre-renovation levels.
Not quite as much, simply because I am thoroughly enjoying
retirement and do not want to work too hard. Heck, I want to
enjoy the updated house.
I do the same thing with Arny and his pedophilia.
Again, that you obsess about this pedophile situation says
way more about you than it does about him. The guy with a
problem is you, buddy boy.
He is so addicted to the
Internet that he would rather be known for the fact that he's a pedophile than
to not post here. You see, I have principles about such things.
Principles? Give me a break. You are a doofus who is
obsessed with pedophiles.
I don't think
it's okay to be a fraud or a pedophile. I guess you could say I have a thing
against blackguards.
Well, you obviously have a "thing," but it does not have
much to do with your being against blackguards and
pedophiles.
Leave it to a profane lowbrow such as yourself to call some
of the more descriptive terms found within the King's
English arcane.
Do you know what arcane means?
That you would consider the term "blackguard" as somehow
arcane reveals much about your intellectual depth.
And yet you obviously lack the intelligence to explain why.
Am I supposed to take the time to unravel all the
commentaries of a fool and a blackguard?
In other words, yes, you lack the intelligence. Thanks, slick.
Actually, what you said made no sense, whatsoever. Why work
to "unravel" nonsense written by a doofus and blackguard who
is obsessed with phantom pedophiles?
And by the
way, I bet Peter Walker thought you were a blackguard, too.
All those involved will have to read what I wrote about Quad
loudspeakers (and dozens of other manufacturers, topics, and
individuals) in The Encyclopedia of Recorded Sound to find
out.
Howard Ferstler
|