Howard said:
Marc Phillips wrote:
Howard said:
I wrote about soundstaging and imaging in a column once for
The Sensible Sound
That was a long time ago, before you were branded as a fraud.
and also posted an excerpt from that
column in response to a comment about soundstaging in
another thread.
Which no one read.
I believe that in the introduction I mentioned something
about intellectual inadequacies being a problem for certain
readers. No doubt that group includes you.
I doubt it, slick. For instance, if I had been caught plagiarizing on a Usenet
newsgroup, I'd be smart enough to never show my face there again. Obviously,
the same cannot be said about you.
Nobody seems to have responded to it (possibly, because the
topic and discussion sailed right over the collected RAO
heads, but
Nobody responded to it because you are a disgraced audio fraud,
Say, have I mentioned that The Encyclopedia of Recorded
Sound (which has me as a major contributor and editor) is
due out this month? Have I mentioned that I am still
publishing articles? I have only been disgraced in the minds
of audio fatheads such as yourself.
The Encyclopedia of Recorded Sound was delayed for quite a long time,
undoubtedly because people had to be assigned to research everything you
submitted to make sure no other plagiarism had occured. And perhaps you'd like
to explain why you are no longer writing for TAV.
Let's face it. Work has slowed down for you since your fraudulant episode.
and you have
nothing to contribute here.
Only because this place mostly mimics a lunatic asylum.
Fueled by your friend, Arny Krueger, the pedophile, and his various sockpuppet
supporters. And we all know that you told someone in the audio world that you
didn't mind that Arny was a pedophile, because it was more important to have an
ally in the fight against the EHEE.
You sound like a lunatic to me. Maybe you do belong here.
Actually, I imagine that there are a number of people here
on RAO who are both able to digest what I posted regarding
soundstaging and willing and able to learn something beyond
the baloney that people like you post.
Nice generalization there. In the real world, I help people daily with audio
matters, and I get thanked daily. In the six years I've written about audio,
not one person has complained that I gave them bad advice.
Most people are wondering how desperate and lonely
your life must be for you to try and come back here and pretend nothing
happened.
Hey, who's pretending? Actually, I come back here at times
to just unsettle skin-crawling, sub-intellectual creepos
like you.
No, you don't. You come back here because you need us more than we need you
(which isn't difficult, since no one here "needs" you). You can't stay away.
You are addicted to the Internet, and you are addicted to RAO. The months you
spent exiled from here were the worst times in your life. And you lurked here
almost daily, because whenever your name was mentioned, there you were.
also possibly because most of those who read my
stuff here are more interested in delivering jabs than in
discussing audio),
We don't want to discuss audio with YOU. You are a jerk, a tweako-freako,
and
a blackguard.
You do not want to discuss audio with me, because you are
too stupid to understand much of what I say.
I've discussed audio with you. I found you pedestrian, unoriginal, boorish,
narrow-minded, and unable to elaborate your point without retreating to get
more information from your keepers. I've even discussed your boorish behavior
in print.
and so here again is an edited "excerpt"
of several sections from that column:
Which was obviously cut-and-pasted from someone else views on the subject.
Nope. All my own, original stuff. Read the article. Go then
go forth into the audio-world wilderness and find where
anyone has said the same things about soundstaging and
imaging.
I find it difficult to get past the first few paragraphs of anything you write,
because you are the most boring writer I've ever seen.
Why
don't you ask them to discuss here in person instead. It is well-known
that
you have no original ideas about audio, and that you only parrot what is
being
prompted to you by others.
Well, few people, anywhere, have fully original ideas about
much of anything. However, unlike you, who are an obdurate
blowhard, I do indeed have some nifty and original things to
say about audio, particularly when it comes to imaging and
soundstaging.
In your own fantasy world, Internet geek.
Boon
|