Robert Morein wrote:

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Clyde Slick" wrote in message


Fox News reports that two Russian planes crashed outside of Moscow,
within minutes of each other. They departed from the same airport.
Mid air collision, or terrorism?

CNN and MSNBC are silent on this item, so far.

Not true at 8 pm EDT last night.

Two planes originating from the same airport go down within 3 minutes, but
100's of miles apart. One plane transmitted a signal indicating that it
was
being hijacked. Witnesses say that one plane exploded in the air before
crashing.

The leading seemingly totally factual clues are the facts that the planes
originated from the same airport and went down within 3 minutes so far
apart.

It seems like the only remaining question is which terrorist group(s) are
responsible. Otherwise, we've got a candidate for the biggest coincidence
of
the millennium.

Prove it wasn't bad fuel out of the same tank.

How would anyone be able to *prove* that from another continent ?

As it happens - 'jet engines' are very tolerant of fuel quality. Poor fuel may
not be good for engine life - but it's basically only kerosene.

'Bad fuel' also won't cause a plane to explode. Even if the engines 'flamed out'
you can glide even a modern jet quite effectively.

Recent example - Air Transat ovre the Atlantic - rather longer ago Air Canada
en-route domestic flight. Both planes landed successfully ( but not at their
intended destination ) with no loss of life. No idea why Canadian airlines are
so keen on this trick though.

The other pilot DID NOT trigger a hijack signal.
Therefore, the information contained in the alarm is zero.

You're really weak on this one, Arny.
If you had anything, you'd produce a quote or at least a body part from the
hijacker.

You want body parts ?


Graham