On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 23:18:24 +0200, Lionel
wrote:

dave weil a écrit :

On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 22:56:31 +0200, Lionel
wrote:


dave weil a écrit :


On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 11:08:01 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:



"dave weil" wrote in message
om



You know Arnold, your tone here is unwarranted. All I did was give the
original poster information for followup.

All I did was give the original poster information for followup.



And I didn't make any
comments that could be interpreted as a slam against you.

And I didn't make any personal comments that could be interpreted as a slam
against you.

Just goes to show....


Bull****:

"Wild speculation noted".

Did you say that or not? I think that the reasonable person might say
that your tone through the whole thing was dismissive.

But thanks for ccpying my sentence above. It warms the cockles of my
heart.

Note that if you was so "polite" you would have answered to the guy who
has started the thread and not to Arnold's...
Sometime I am afraid to see how you can be dishonest Dave. :-(


It wasn't until Arnold said that they were out of business that I
decided to check into it, because it seemed that I had seen something
recently about the brand.

Does that make sense to you?

Yes this make sens to me but this is not true.

It *is* true.

You perfectly know that doing that you was trolling Arnold.

First of all, I *wasn't*. If I *had* been trolling Arnold, I would
have made some snide remarks about his ability to find things on the
web. I did not.

Since the
time you are trolling him at the same hour every day you perfectly know
what will be his reaction if you attach such answer to one of his post.

I see. So if I think that Arnold hasn't given useful information to
some poster, I should just keep the possible pertinent info to myself,
right?

Your above obfuscation is hypocrite, dishonest since you exactly got
what you was looking for. ;-)

This just isn't true. I certainly wasn't ecpecting a thank you from
Arnold, since it didn't matter to him one way or the other, but I
wasn't asking for a poke in the eye either.

Don't spit in your soup, Dave.

The question now is "Why are *you* trolling *me*"?