Dave Weil wrote:


On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 22:56:31 +0200, Lionel
wrote:

dave weil a écrit :

On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 11:08:01 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:


"dave weil" wrote in message
m


You know Arnold, your tone here is unwarranted. All I did was give the
original poster information for followup.

All I did was give the original poster information for followup.


And I didn't make any
comments that could be interpreted as a slam against you.

And I didn't make any personal comments that could be interpreted as a
slam
against you.

Just goes to show....


Bull****:

"Wild speculation noted".

Did you say that or not? I think that the reasonable person might say
that your tone through the whole thing was dismissive.

But thanks for ccpying my sentence above. It warms the cockles of my
heart.

Note that if you was so "polite" you would have answered to the guy who
has started the thread and not to Arnold's...
Sometime I am afraid to see how you can be dishonest Dave. :-(

It wasn't until Arnold said that they were out of business that I
decided to check into it, because it seemed that I had seen something
recently about the brand.

Does that make sense to you?








Since Lionel has no more cortical tissue than an amoeba, and about the same
comprehension level, he's attempted to simplify his petty, distorted, little
world by use of the following rules: (1) Agree with Krueger = "good", (2)
Disagree with Krueger = "bad". Anything more complex or more honest than that
is beyond his reach.

Bruce J. Richman