View Single Post
  #18   Report Post  
Bruce J. Richman
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Arny Krueger wrote:


"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message


Not that I care about their paranoid rantings all that
much. In fact, Krueger's recent paranoid rantings and ravings about
The Devil's post about his childhood development, and his allegations
of cowardice by myself and Weil were even bigger scores.


Here's what Richman is bragging about:

"The Devil" wrote in message
news:d1s1i0ljbvdr9b1asv7eh4o092ah9d7i4c@rdmzrnew stxt.nz


Inspiration has been lacking in other areas today, so I allowed my
mind to journey in another direction. I was wondering what events in
your past would turn you into the hopping flea-pit of insanity we see
today. I have it on good authority that your mother cleaned the floors
of an asylum and that is where she met your father. He was tethered
upside down to a board, with various metal apparatus attaching his
teeth to the wall so he couldn't bite off anyone's feet. Your mother,
enchanted by upside-down things (particularly people), decided that
she would mop the floor of his dungeon first and **** him afterwards.
The impassioned upside-down **** created a child. To mother's delight,
the child much preferred being kicked than hugged. It also enjoyed
being taped upside down to the wall, with its pacifier in its arse,
while mommy whipped it with light flex and breast fed its nostrils.



Especially since they simply illustrated Krueger's serious psychological
problems.


Yes, I don't like seeing my mother libelled. So, here's Richman's
diagnosis -The fact that I don't like seeing my mother libeled means that I
have a serious psychological problem.










You don't like seeing your mother libelled? Here's a clue for you, Attorney
Krueger - she was not libeled. She was ridiculed and/or included in an
obviously satirical piece by The Devil.

Note that contrary to Krueger's latest lie, no diagnosis was made by me of him.
My opinion that he has "serious psychological problems" was based on his
behavior over a seven year history on RAO. His claims that because Dave
Weil and I did not condemn The Devil's post means we're cowards - was further
evidence of his serious problems. How come he didn't complain about all the
other people that did not condemn The Devil's post? Are they cowards also?

If you say yes, you've provided excellent evidence to support my opinion about
you.
And if you say no, you've also provided excellent evidence to support my
opinion about you.

Now, that's a *real* score.



Bruce J. Richman