"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Arny Krueger wrote:
"Lionel" wrote in message
Doctor,
Since one week you have produced a lot of psychologic diagnostics on
RAO.
In order to validate your analyses we need to get from you an official
document signed by 3 of your confreres stating that your are sane,
without any mental affections which could bias your judgement, and
that you are in full possession of your intellectuals faculties.
We kindly request this document from you within a delay of 1 month.
If you don't comply with this requierement we will fill a lawsuit
against you for abusive diagnostic and libel.
Note that independantly of the lawsuit we will request official
countervaluations which will be done and published at your cost.
I think that for openers, Richman should provide us with enough
information
to mount a credible lawsuit against him, such as his true name and legal
address. Absent that, we have proof that he is hiding behind the
anonymity
of his AOL posting address in order to be abusive without taking any
responsibility for his behavior.
You and Lionel have no proof of anything other than the fact you are
woefully
ignorant of the difference between libel and the types of pathological
lies
spewed by delusional cretins such as yourself and LIonel.
Lionel is just upset that he's been killfiled and can no longer elicit any
direct responses to anything he has to say.
Also, neither he nor you have even the remotest understanding of what
libel is
and is not.
li·bel ( P ) Pronunciation Key (lbl)
n.
1..
1.. A false publication, as in writing, print, signs, or pictures,
that damages a person's reputation.
2.. The act of presenting such material to the public.
2.. The written claims presented by a plaintiff in an action at
admiralty law or to an ecclesiastical court.
Your stupidity, coupled with his, would be laughed at by any
attorney, judge or jury shoul you ever try and attach that description to
anything I've ever said or done on Usenet.
Also, I've never diagnosed anybody on RAO and can prove it. I also can
prove
that you have repeatedly libeled me on RAO, as has Ferstler & McKelvy.
How has your reputation been damaged by any of us?
The real damage done to you is by yor own hand.
Since Krueger likes to claim that Scott's libel suit was thrown out of
court,
even though that is obviously a lie believed only by bottom feeders like
Lionel
and Krueger,
he obviously is being hypocritical and contradicting his own delusional
beliefs
if he thinks *his* libel suit against me will even get as far as Scott's
did.
He's, as usual, full of it.
It looks as though he has grounds according to the above definition.
I suggest that Krueger make a list of all the many enemies he has that
have
"libeled" him on RAO, and then ask them to provide legitimate names and
addresses so that he and his fellow dummy, Lionel, can demonstrate their
legal
stupidity in a court of law. Perhaps the 2 of them can get Mikey and
Howierd
to join them and file a class action suit against all of us.
Not the worst idea I've heard.
ROFLMAO !!!
BTW, it's very easy for all but the totally obtunded idots like Krueger
and
Lionel to easily verify both my name and address.
Their ignorance is their problem, not mine.
And the vulgarity and vitriol are yours.
How many beans have you counted today?
Bruce J. Richman
|